------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Member of the European Parliament.
As an European citizen, I urge to reject the ACTA treaty on july 2-5.
ACTA is no designed in Europe for Europeans' benefit nor problems nor
economy nor freedom... It only benefits to big American corporations'
interests killing Europeans' freedoms for their benefit. It tries to
lockout any and all reforms of copyright and patent structures which
could benefit European culture and innovation. It has been designed to
prevent next (and actual) generation of entrepreneurs from developing
new and better productos and services which displace old bussiness
leaders from their position. They spend efforts in keeping this
position in stead of developing new ideas which has no benefit for
Europeans.
Europe is living a critical moment where we must look for our best
options and interests which are not foreign ones. We must stop steping
on our rights and civil liberties for foregin benefits. We'd like (and
need) to have political representatives which take care of us as
Americans do trying to build this kind of treaties worldwide.
As new powerfull countries begin to arrive in Asia we need to be as
competitive as we can and this laws are amputating our legs to run
this race.
Hope you listen to our voices.
Best regards.
Ivan Eguiguren
Spain
P.S.: I have understood that some MEPs have voiced concerns that mails
like this one would be part of an automated process, and even regarded
it as a form of attack, in that sense. I want to underscore that this
mail is not part of an automated process.
I am not an attack – I am a European voter, pleading for my
representatives to represent me against US businesses. (For the
technically inclined, the mail headers will show that the identical
copies you may have received of this sample letter were all sent
manually, one by one, by different people.)
As an European citizen, I urge to reject the ACTA treaty on july 2-5.
ACTA is no designed in Europe for Europeans' benefit nor problems nor
economy nor freedom... It only benefits to big American corporations'
interests killing Europeans' freedoms for their benefit. It tries to
lockout any and all reforms of copyright and patent structures which
could benefit European culture and innovation. It has been designed to
prevent next (and actual) generation of entrepreneurs from developing
new and better productos and services which displace old bussiness
leaders from their position. They spend efforts in keeping this
position in stead of developing new ideas which has no benefit for
Europeans.
Europe is living a critical moment where we must look for our best
options and interests which are not foreign ones. We must stop steping
on our rights and civil liberties for foregin benefits. We'd like (and
need) to have political representatives which take care of us as
Americans do trying to build this kind of treaties worldwide.
As new powerfull countries begin to arrive in Asia we need to be as
competitive as we can and this laws are amputating our legs to run
this race.
Hope you listen to our voices.
Best regards.
Ivan Eguiguren
Spain
P.S.: I have understood that some MEPs have voiced concerns that mails
like this one would be part of an automated process, and even regarded
it as a form of attack, in that sense. I want to underscore that this
mail is not part of an automated process.
I am not an attack – I am a European voter, pleading for my
representatives to represent me against US businesses. (For the
technically inclined, the mail headers will show that the identical
copies you may have received of this sample letter were all sent
manually, one by one, by different people.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lo he enviado a las 8:23am y hasta ahora, 11:41am me han respondido 3 eurodiputados (mejor dicho, me han respondido de sus oficinas) para indicarme que votarán en contra. Éstos son:
- Nigel Farage
- Mojca Kleva
- Auke Zijlstra
- Helmut Scholz
Realmente espero que lo cumplan porque a mí me han alegrado el día y, de no hacerlo, mañana mi tristeza será doble. EDITO: en contra de lo que opinaba (realmente pensaba que ni me contestarían), me está gustando mucho que expliquen sus posiciones en sus correos. Scholz, por ejemplo, indica que está en contra de ACTA, que no de los derechos de autor, y que considera que deben tratarse independientemente "las falsificaciones" de bienes, medicinas y esperar las opiniones del sector creativo en el entorno digital. También que se debe llegar a un acuerdo con China, Brasil o India para aunar las diferentes legislaciones. Mojca Kleva indica que ACTA indica correctamente el problema pero da respuestas equivocadas. Por otra parte, de Nigel Farage destaco que indica que ACTA eleva la cuestiones de infracciones de derechos de autor, patentes y marcas registradas de la ley civil a la ley criminal en 39 paises.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario